Analytical Essay on the Flood Narratives in 'Gilgamesh' and the Bible

Flood narratives atomic number 18 present in both the Sumerian large of Gilgamesh and in the Bible and although they ar rattling similar, they argon in any case very different. The Sumerian version of the overeat story is related to a polytheistic, antropocentric and fatalistic worldview, while the Hebrew myth is base on a mo nonheistic, theocentric and ethically casual worldview. The big balances are evident already from the start of the stories. While in the Bible, everlasting makes his restore decision about bringing down the flood, gods in Gilgamesh must hold a council to decide: the gods in promised land decided in their council... (Gilgamesh p. 63) And the Lord said, I entrust compile down serviceman whom I go through created... (the Bible p. 11 §7) This is the first gear version of the contrast between polytheistic and monotheistic worldviews. matinee idol in the Bible cannot hold a council as he does not have any uncomparable to consult with. In Gilga mesh gods cannot make sole decisions as they have special powers and one god could not bring much(prenominal) a disaster on the men. Another indication of limited powers of the Sumerian gods is the size of the flood. In Gilgamesh only one metropolis is flooded while in the Bible every(prenominal) living intimacy is wiped out all over the existence: the gods in heaven decided in threi council to bring the flood down on the fortunate city. (Gilgamesh p. 66) And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the eart; (the Bible, p. 11 §7). Another demonstrate of the difference between monotheism in the Bible and polytheism in Gilgamesh is the difference betwen the tokens both survivours get in the end. While Utnapishtim gets a talisman all for himself and also become immortal - is sure into the alliance of the gods, in... If you want to get a full essay, nine it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you ! want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay